Our Discourse installation got a feature for choosing icons for categories today! Iāve tried to make some reasonable selection from the available icon set so that we can try it out
I personally find it nicer than the plain colored squares, but I wouldnāt mind some feedback from others
Though, if you are more fond of the colored squares, please feel free to share that opinion as well!
Specifically, what could be useful are suggestions for ābetterā icon choices. We can apparently choose from (almost?) all of the free icons on fontawesome.com, searchable here. I guess, technically ā just to mention this option ā it should also be possible to upload any other custom svg an an icon[1] as long as they are free/legal to use.[2]
E.g. I almost went with some question-mark [ ] for help, but that category appears so commonly, itād probably be too much "?" appearing everywhere. The speech bubble choice for now also keeps it deliberately square-like, so itās not that stark of a contrast from before. Another one thatās currently particularly generic-looking is ācode reviewā ā it seems non-trivial to me to find a more specific one that still āfitsā, but maybe I missed something? E.g. there are a lot of these āfileā-related icons[3], or maybe something (else) from this category[4] can be preferable, after all?
And āmetaā is also rather arbitrary, I suppose ā itās hard to find a concept for it (one thing of note is that the main page of URLO, when not logged in, prominently features 2 meta posts, the pinned Welcome thread, and Formatting guideline)
Iāve also slightly tweaked some of the category colors[5], and made category names consistently lower-case. And the list of all categories has a manually defined order now (previously it was always sorted by total number of posts per category). This allows in particular for pushing down "uncategorized" a few places. (IMO it makes little sense when composing a new topic, that youāre immediately (as the second option) presented the option to ānot actually choose a category after allā, and you have to scroll past it to see more of the actual categories.) So well ā I guess, Iām open to feedback / suggestions on tweaking this ordering, too.
I suppose, weāre also missing a description text for ātutorialsā, so if someone wants to suggest a wording or tweak any of the other category description texts Iām happy to adapt any concrete suggestion that look like clear improvements to me!
really, Discourseās appearance is very customizable anyway, if one puts in the work
the main thing thatās new is also perhaps better characterized by saying that icons for categories are now a standard feature, and easy to select through the standard site/category settings
itās not like a comparable customization (or much more) would have been completely impossible before ā©ļø
Oh thatās actually pretty cool, Iām learning only now that these āfont-awesomeā icons ā well the free ones at least ā are in fact published with CC licenses, so even just additional adjustment(s) or further remixing/combining/transforming these icons something isnāt entirely impossible. ā©ļø
Iām referring to the top of that page; the linked search result is also containing unrelated stuff ā©ļø
even though we are addressing how ācategories can have iconsā in this topic, it looks like those icons also have ācategoriesā ā©ļø
e.g. "embedded" was too dark, appearing nearly black on light theme, and being very low contrast on dark theme ā©ļø