I have to say I don't fully see the advantage of parser generators at all, they seem too magical. Is there something inherently wrong with parser combinator libraries for parsing a language? I could potentially see that it might be easier to make large scale changes to a parser generator.
This is why I like them, I write my grammar and I get AST, no coding involved. One of benefits is that library may improve with time in terms of speed or error messages, and I won't have to do anything to get that, so +1 for lalrpop from me.
I am using it and had no problems with it, though I'd love to see ANTLR supporting Rust.
I'm quite happy with nom for now, the documentation could be better (and I'll try to also work on it). If you want to help improve it join the discussion here:
Since I was just asking myself the same question, I looked around for articles on the topic. I can recommend this article on the differences between parser combinators and parser generators. It helped me a lot to make an informed decision.