Why is `proc-macro2`'s functionality not part of the standard library?

proc-macro2 is used by most of the procedural macros out there because of its two selling points:

  • Bring proc-macro-like functionality to other contexts like build.rs and main.rs.
  • Make procedural macros unit testable.

This is made possible by a fallback implementation in proc-macro2, in the case where no connection to the compiler is available.

What is the reason (technical or otherwise) that this functionality is not integrated into the built-in proc_macro crate? And is there work being done on changing this? (If not, then I'm semi-interested in trying to do so)

It'll need a new RFC. But before you start, have a look at the old RFC in 2016

https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1566-proc-macros.html

...
We introduce a special configuration option: #[cfg(proc_macro)]. Items with this configuration are not macros themselves but are compiled only for macro uses.

If a crate is a proc-macro crate, then the proc_macro cfg variable is true for the whole crate. Initially it will be false for all other crates. This has the effect of partitioning crates into macro- defining and non-macro defining crates. In the future, I hope we can relax these restrictions so that macro and non-macro code can live in the same crate.
...

Thanks for the link!

I did also just find Figure out a better story around optional proc_macro · Issue #139 · dtolnay/proc-macro2 · GitHub, so it seems like work has been done in the past to try to further enable this.

Still interested if there's any new developments that I don't know about.

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. We invite you to open a new topic if you have further questions or comments.