Why can't I `use Self::*` in an enum's impl?

[MTCoster]

I've already read this post, but that seems to talk about an issue that has been resolved (rust-lang/rust#56225).

Assuming this enum:

pub enum MyType {
    Foo,
    Bar,
    Baz,
}

I can use either of these options to refer to the variants of MyType:

impl MyType {
    pub fn new_foo() -> Self {
        Self::Foo
    }

    pub fn new_bar() -> Self {
        use MyType::*;
        Bar
    }
}

However, attempting to combine the two methods fails:

impl MyType {
    pub fn new_baz() -> Self {
        use Self::*;
        Baz
    }
}

Why is this?

playground link for the above snippets

[steffahn]

Even though this doesn’t answer the question, note that the behavior is the same for type aliases or use statements without the * like use Self::Baz.

pub enum MyType {
    Foo,
    Bar,
}

type Alias = MyType;

impl MyType {
    pub fn new_foo() -> Self {
        Alias::Foo // works
    }

    pub fn new_bar() -> Self {
        use Alias::Bar; // doesn’t work; Alias::* wouldn’t work either
        Bar
    }
}

(playground)

Edit: Here’s an issue asking the same question

Cannot use `use Self::*;` inside a method

as far as I understand, I would guess (without knowing the compiler internals myself) that the reason why use Self::* doesn’t work is something along the lines of

• Self is like an implicitly defined type alias
• type aliases are part of the type system and are only resolved by the type-checker
• use statements relies on the module system and not the type system
• resolving paths like MyType::* (or more precisely: resolving something like Foo in the presence of such a use statement) has to happen much earlier in compilation than type checking

[MTCoster]

Thanks @steffhan, I was having trouble searching for the phrase "use Self::*" with so many symbols!

It looks like it was a conscious design by the lang team to not allow this to work; I guess I'll just settle for one of the other options.