What's the deal with `&*`?

help
#1

Hi,

from time to time I see &*foo, and I have never really understood it. I just saw it again in one of the threads here in URLO, so I finally decided to ask what's that about.

For example I just saw it in @alice's post here.

When should one use &*foo instead of just foo?

2 Likes
#2

The * operator can be used to dereference any “pointer” type, meaning anything that implements the Deref and/or DerefMut traits.

For example, String, &mut str, Box<str>, MutexGuard<str>, and Rc<str> all point to a str slice. (They all implement Deref<str>.) So if you have a variable s with any of those types, then &*s will borrow an &str reference to that slice.

In many cases, deref coercion allows you to leave out the * and just write &s.

In alice's post, &* was used to explicitly convert from &mut T to &T.

6 Likes
#3

I think I get it, but why is a conversion from &mut T to &T necessary? This compiles just fine:

fn foo(x: &i32) {
    print!("x = {}", *x);
}

fn main() {
    let mut x = 42;
    foo(&mut x);
}
#4

There are some places where the coercion does not trigger, for example

#5

Also all those type coercions are disabled within the generic context. &T and &*T may implements same traits with different implementation, and we don't allow coercions implicitly change our code's behavior.

#6

Wait, but the book explains deref coercion with generics?

Rust does deref coercion when it finds types and trait implementations in three cases:

  • From &T to &U when T: Deref<Target=U>
  • From &mut T to &mut U when T: DerefMut<Target=U>
  • From &mut T to &U when T: Deref<Target=U>
#7

It's just a way to explain when it happens. When type inference doesn't know both the source and target of a deref coercion for certain, it will not coerce.

2 Likes
#8

I think it's slowly clicking for me, but I still do not understand this:

#9

If costumer is an &mut T, then writing &costumer gives you an &&mut T. If you wanted an &T instead, you write &*customer. This makes sense because *customer on a &mut T gives an T, so adding an & on that gives a &T.

Sure, sometimes this conversion happens automatically, but not always, and it is possible to explicitly write the conversion with &*.

3 Likes
#10

Alright, I understand now. Thanks for your help!

#11

It is necessary if you want to have multiple non-unique references down the line:

fn print(x: &u64) {
    println!("{}", x);
}

fn do_it(x: &mut u64) {
    *x += 1;
    let y = &*x;
    let z = &*x;
    print(y);
    print(z);
}

fn main() {
    let mut x = 3;
    do_it(&mut x);
}
1 Like
#12

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. We invite you to open a new topic if you have further questions or comments.