Understanding the perils of `Deref`

[dthul]

@Phlopsi

but your wrapper type doesn't forward a deref erential action, you just borrow the inner value as-is, thus it is appropriate to implement Borrow , but not Deref .

For a wrapper type, I want to implement Deref to make things like method call syntax work transparently on the inner type, no? I don't want to call borrow first. You "deref the wrapper away".