It's a footgun, yes, but it's a sound footgun.
— Ralf Jung (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155750#discussion_r3356323620)
It's a footgun, yes, but it's a sound footgun.
— Ralf Jung (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155750#discussion_r3356323620)
Shnatsel: "The never type is named after the date of its stabilization" was a good joke while it lasted.
j_platte: Who knows, it could still last ![]()
Terrible quote of the week
I like Rust because it lets you play with
!matches!
I think this is the wrong decision, and I wish the lang team had stabilized the Late type instead.
Better Late than Never.
Amanieu: This is how LLVM does float comparison: LLVM Language Reference Manual — LLVM 23.0.0git documentation. There's 14 of them, all make sense and most if not all produce total order
(the team emits a collective groan)
I do rather hope anyone using
-Zllvm-target-featuresor any stabilized form thereof would know that they are getting a conversation with the dragon directly and they should mind their words carefully if they do not wish to be barbecued by it and served over a nice plate of iron filings.
— workingjubilee on Rust zulip
A moment of philosophical questions:
Thank you for your PR, but please edit the description like you are a chainsaw-wielding maniac that just discovered the sentences are young adults who came to the lake at summer camp after sunset.
— workingjubilee, at resolve: fix effective visibilities for items in ambiguous glob sets by calvinrp · Pull Request #159039 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
but I gave up on the idea as the macro rules were turning into a turing complete rust syntax parser
I don't think this is true for URLO moderators, still had to chuckle at this amusing hyperbole
:
When I first saw that nonsensical topic title, I knew there would be trouble. I think I (just) managed to stay out of it. I think I did draft a reply at one stage, then (sensibly I think) discarded it.