My small nano-business was sued by Microsoft one year after it was established, likely due to a bulk lawsuit farming strategy from an outsourced lawyer.
We’ve already sold a new app, which is closed-source and developed for Windows, and we’re currently deciding on the programming language, preferably moving away from Java.
Here’s what I know:
- We are tied to the Microsoft Visual Studio Community (for the Microsoft Compiler) under Business and Enterprise licensing conditions. In our case, it seems we fall under the Business category if we use and deploy over five devices.
- The GNU ABI has far less compatibility for Windows crates.
- Microsoft can change its licensing terms, as Oracle did, which we are currently compliant with.
- Rust’s Apache 2.0 | MIT License, and crates’ licenses seem acceptable so far.
So, is there any real way to untie us from the Visual Studio licensing scheme and avoid being subject to legal interpretation if we deploy over five devices?
We are really eager to start using Rust as soon as possible, but these legal issues are holding us back significantly, especially since we didn’t anticipate that Rust might involve such licensing schemes.