such as how to interpret

```
&x[0].method()
```

thanks!

I tried to find the answer in the reference, but did not.

such as how to interpret

```
&x[0].method()
```

thanks!

I tried to find the answer in the reference, but did not.

That example is the same as `&(x[0].method())`

. There is an operator precedence section, I *think* it is correct to model the method-call `.`

as a binary operator with the strongest precedence (i.e. above `as`

).

Thanks. how about index? bind tightest I guess? the reference only talk about operator precedence. I did not find information about the method call and index precedence relative to operators. they often mix together.