This is a continuation of your previous topic, and this note still stands. Please read it.
You don’t need to get stringify!(el2!()) to give "el2". It isn’t possible. stringify!(SOME_TOKENS) always gives "SOME_TOKENS".
Your repeated questions about this are a classic case of the XY problem.
- You want to do X (I’m not sure because you won’t say)
- You think you can get to X (?) by getting Y (some macro or const being able to expand to the literal text
"el2"). - You don’t know how to do Y because it isn’t feasibly possible but you ask for help on it.
- People here on URLO are confused because Y is clearly not the root cause of your problem.
- You don’t read the responses fully and keep asking about Y (some macro or const being able to expand to the literal text
"el2").
I can’t give you Y because it isn’t possible the way you’re asking.
What is X?
What is your root problem?
Are you not reading the responses because you don’t fully speak English or just because you’re adamant on getting it done the way you would have in C?
If the latter, refer to this post I linked to earlier.
If the former (not really speaking English) I’m sorry about that, but please understand that getting stringify!(some_macro!()) to give "el2" or any other string is not possible. You might want my asm! solution from the previous topic.
If that won’t work, please explain why.