Suppose we have plus_0 and mul_0 which are defined on i32's and we want to generalize it to operate on Vec<i32> with the following constraints: we want to inline mul_0, plus_0 rather than a function call per + * Here is what I have so far. I am stuck on figuring how to invoke the plus_0 / mul_0,…

I think a cleaner trait solution might have the trait only for do_scalar, and something similar to your first code for the rest of it. Maybe something like this? pub struct Messy<Fniii> { data_iii: std::marker::PhantomData<Fniii>, } impl<Fniii> Messy<Fniii> where Fniii: ScalarOperation, { …

Inlined code for operating on scala -> operating on vec

alice May 5, 2020, 8:33am 8

I don't know the rules regarding traits and inlining.

Trait / inline interaction, force functions to be inlined

Topic		Replies	Views
Trait / inline interaction, force functions to be inlined	6	786	August 3, 2020
#inline[always], i32/i64/f32/f64, trait vs macros	3	515	July 16, 2021
Force inlining for deep call chains (with frunk) help	1	84	August 16, 2025
Trait Method inlining	9	6509	January 12, 2023
Why doesn't the Default trait of Vec use the inline attribute? help	12	439	October 9, 2024

Inlined code for operating on scala -> operating on vec

Related topics