Interesting.. I guess that means the code uses collect
in a bunch of places and then never mutates the map again, which isn't all that surprising. Your observation about inlining is probably correct, though it does mean that llvm-lines
will attribute a bunch of IR to a slightly misleading function. In the sense that it'll show more IR for the calling function, rather than counting it as more monomorphizations of the inner function. But that's likely hard to fix...
Thanks for the .ll
command. It'd be handy to have this plus the rg
command listed in the tool README
. How did you trace the IR back to the callsite though — it doesn't look like this information is in the .ll
file afaict?