Groups for rustc and rustdoc lints?

1

i'd like to enable lints that are disabled by default (why is that anyway?) but doing so will end up with something like

#![warn(
    clippy::nursery,
    clippy::pedantic,
    rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links,
    rustdoc::private_intra_doc_links,
    rustdoc::missing_crate_level_docs,
    rustdoc::private_doc_tests,
    rustdoc::invalid_codeblock_attributes,
    rustdoc::invalid_html_tags,
    rustdoc::invalid_rust_codeblocks,
    rustdoc::bare_urls,
    absolute_paths_not_starting_with_crate,
    elided_lifetimes_in_paths,
    explicit_outlives_requirements,
    keyword_idents,
    macro_use_extern_crate,
    meta_variable_misuse,
    missing_abi,
    missing_copy_implementations,
    missing_debug_implementations,
    non_ascii_idents,
    noop_method_call,
    pointer_structural_match,
    rust_2021_incompatible_closure_captures,
    rust_2021_incompatible_or_patterns,
    rust_2021_prefixes_incompatible_syntax,
    rust_2021_prelude_collisions,
    single_use_lifetimes,
    trivial_casts,
    trivial_numeric_casts,
    unsafe_code,
    unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn,
    unstable_features,
    unused_crate_dependencies,
    unused_extern_crates,
    unused_import_braces,
    unused_lifetimes,
    unused_macro_rules,
    unused_qualifications,
    variant_size_differences
)]

are there groups for these like there is for clippy? if not, why not? i looked through the docs but couldnt find anything, thank you!

2

Yes, see Lint Groups - The rustc book

3

Because some can be problematic, for example they have too much false positive. Some contradict each others. Others are plain controversial.

2 Likes
4

Some of these lints are already warn by default, and are all stable lints included in one of these groups?

5

also are there groups for rustdoc lints?

6

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. We invite you to open a new topic if you have further questions or comments.