Disabling rustdoc tests for module?

[iffyio]

Hi! I have a module that include!s some code generated by an external library.

mod Foo {
  include!("code.gen.rs");
}

The generated code happens to have comments that contain words enclosed in consecutive backticks ``` so that running rustdoc on my project treats part of the comments as my rust tests and fails as a result since the library wasn't trying to include rust code.
Is there any way to get rustdoc to ignore doc tests for a module? I couldn't find any work around so far.

[Yandros]

cfg(doctest) seems to be a thing, so you can try to add that cfg (negated) and see if it works :

#[cfg(not(doctest))]
mod Foo {
    include!("code.gen.rs");
}

[iffyio]

I can't use that in this case unfortunately since it means the entire module won't be included which would break the rest of the codebase that relies on it

[Yandros]

Did you test it? The idea is that the Rust codebase is "examined" through multiple passes; the #[cfg(not(doctest))] ought to disable your module for the doctest pass only, that is, it will be available to normal passes; it will even be present in the documentation!

[iffyio]

Yeah, that was my initial attempt to resolve the issue, to clarify, since the generated code contains modules etc I had to disable at the module level instead rather than any struct as in your example (since I can't change the included code) for example:

pub mod foo {
  #![cfg(not(doctest))]
  ///```
  /// Wops
  ///
  pub bar() {}
  pub mod submodule{}
  }

The breakage arises in my code elsewhere that e.g imports the generated modules (running cargo test --doc)

mod caller {
  use crate::foo::submodule; // compiler error since submodule doesn't exist because it wasn't included in the doctest.
}

[jplatte]

If all else fails you can write a proc-macro to remove or rewrite these doc comments, which is probably easiest using syn::visit_mut. Untested first draft:

struct RemoveDocs;

impl syn::VisitMut for RemoveDocs {
    fn visit_attribute_mut(&mut self, attr: &mut Attribute) {
        if attr.path.is_ident("doc") {
            *attr = parse_quote! { #[doc = ""] };
        }
    }
}

#[proc_macro]
pub fn remove_docs(input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
    let mut syntax_tree = syn::parse_macro_input!(input as syn::File);
    RemoveDocs.visit_file_mut(&mut syntax_tree);
    quote!(#syntax_tree).into()
}

used as

remove_docs!(include!("code.gen.rs"));

[Cerberuser]

@jplatte

used as

remove_docs!(include!("code.gen.rs"));

This will not work AFAIK (at least not without accessing the file directly), since remove_docs will be expanded before include.

[jplatte]

Well, accessing the file directly would be bad since then you don't get the dependency tracking include! gives you. I think the "proper" solution then is having a macro_rules! macro that wraps remove_docs! & include! and expands the latter first. That's possible, right?

[mbrubeck]

If you are able to modify the code that generates these comments, you can make it add the "ignore" attribute to tell rustdoc that it is not a doctest:

/// ```ignore
/// non-Rust code goes here
/// ```

Or if it contains code in some other language, you can tag it with that language:

/// ```c
/// int main(void) { }
/// ```